History is Gay

Historians Uncover Abraham Lincoln’s Secret Love Life: Three Reported Lovers and a Forbidden Crush on Robert E. Lee

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In what is being hailed as the most scandalous historical revelation since the rumor that Ben Franklin invented electricity just to slide into DMs faster, scholars have unearthed shocking evidence that Abraham Lincoln, the Great Emancipator, had not only three confirmed male lovers—but also a secret, burning attraction to his Civil War arch-nemesis, General Robert E. Lee.

Newly discovered diary entries suggest that while Lincoln was busy fighting to preserve the Union, he may have also been struggling to suppress his conflicted romantic longing for the Confederate general.

Joshua Speed: Lincoln’s First Love?

A historical depiction of Abraham Lincoln and Joshua Speed sharing a moment together

Before we get to Lincoln’s most scandalous wartime crush, we must acknowledge the well-documented bed-sharing, letter-writing, and probably hand-holding relationship between Abe and his longtime companion Joshua Speed.

For four years, the two men lived together, slept together, and wrote letters that can only be described as the 19th-century equivalent of heart-eyes emojis. While some historians insist this was simply a “deep and platonic friendship,” others point out that Lincoln never wrote Mary Todd the kinds of letters he wrote to Speed—letters that included phrases like, "You know my desire to be near you."

“It’s pretty clear Lincoln and Speed had a thing going,” says historian Dr. Franklin Whittaker. “If you read between the lines, Lincoln was basically sending him ‘U up?’ messages before telegrams were even invented.”

Captain Derickson: The White House’s Nightshirt Enthusiast

A historical depiction of Captain David Derickson in a nightshirt

Lincoln’s second rumored male companion was Captain David Derickson, his personal bodyguard, who reportedly took protective duties to a whole new level by sharing the president’s bed and wearing his nightshirt.

According to 19th-century sources (a.k.a. White House staff who were definitely side-eyeing the situation), Derickson spent many nights with Lincoln while Mary Todd was away.

“It was common for men to share beds back then due to space constraints,” says historian Rachel Vanderfield, “but the nightshirt-wearing? That’s a different level of intimacy. That’s like borrowing your partner’s hoodie in modern times.”

A Secret Yearning for the General of the Confederacy?

A historical depiction of General Robert E. Lee on horseback

And now, we arrive at the most scandalous revelation yet: Lincoln’s secret, tormented attraction to Robert E. Lee.

Recently uncovered diary entries reveal that Lincoln not only respected Lee as a military strategist but also harbored an unsettling fascination with the bearded, horseback-riding Southern general.

One particularly cryptic passage in Lincoln’s private writings reads:

"He stands upon his steed, firm and unyielding, his gray eyes piercing as the rifles of his men. How cruel it is that duty should make enemies of those who, in another life, might have walked side by side."

“He was totally thirsting over Lee,” said Dr. Elaine Porter, an expert in presidential diaries. “This isn’t just admiration—this is Shakespearean levels of ‘Oh no, I’m at war with the man of my dreams.’”

Lincoln reportedly struggled with his feelings, particularly as the war dragged on. While he publicly referred to Lee as a traitor to the Union, in private he wrote mysteriously poetic reflections about the general’s “stoic features” and “the commanding grace of his posture.”

The Final Battle: Unresolved Tension

While history records that Lincoln and Lee never officially met in person, some scholars now theorize that Lincoln’s insistence on granting Lee generous surrender terms at Appomattox wasn’t just about reunifying the country—it was a deeply personal farewell.

“Lincoln could have had Lee arrested, imprisoned, or exiled,” said historian Dr. Morgan Phelps. “Instead, he lets him keep his sword, his dignity, and his horse. That’s not just a surrender—it’s a soft breakup.”

Could Lincoln’s private longing for Lee have influenced the outcome of the war? Could this have been the 1860s version of an enemies-to-lovers storyline that history cruelly denied us? We may never know.

A New Look at Honest Abe

A historical depiction of Abraham Lincoln deep in thought

While the debate rages on about Lincoln’s true affections, one thing remains certain: he was not only the man who kept the Union together but also, possibly, one of the most dramatically conflicted romantics of his time.

If the rumors are true, Lincoln’s love life was far more complex than we ever imagined. And, frankly, if this had been known sooner, we’d probably have an HBO miniseries about it by now.

#HonestAbe #LGBTQLincoln #CivilWarCrush #EnemiesToLovers1865

“NAPOLEON WAS A GAY FURRY” – EARTH-SHATTERING DISCOVERY PROVES HISTORY WAS A LIE

Paris, France – The world of history has been violently shaken, flipped upside down, and thrown into the Seine following the discovery of top-secret letters proving that Napoleon Bonaparte—yes, THE Napoleon—was not only a gay furry but may have led France into war in pursuit of his ultimate dream: hosting the world’s first furry empire.

An artist's depiction of Napoleon Bonaparte in a fox-themed fursuit, standing triumphantly with a French flag in the background

The revelation, described by experts as "more shocking than the moon landing being faked," came after a team of researchers at the French National Archives stumbled upon what they first believed to be encrypted military documents. Instead, they were passionate, fox-themed roleplay letters signed “L’Empereur Renard” (The Emperor Fox). The truth they revealed has sent shockwaves through the very foundation of Western civilization.

“I AM NOT NAPOLEON. I AM ROUGEPATTE, THE EMPEROR FOX”

The most earth-shattering discovery comes from Napoleon’s lost personal diary, which was sealed away for over two centuries due to being classified as "too dangerous for public knowledge." In it, the legendary emperor openly confesses:

"The people see me as their ruler, their general, their conqueror. But in my heart, I know the truth. I was never meant for battlefields—I was meant to run wild in the forests, to howl at the moon with my brethren. I am not Napoleon. I am RougePatte, the Emperor Fox."

Historians now believe Napoleon’s true ambition was not world domination, but the creation of a global furry utopia—a kingdom where men and women could live as their true fursonas, free from persecution. Some experts claim his conquests were merely a "fursona liberation campaign," meant to establish an all-furry empire where fursuits were mandatory, and tax breaks were given to those with tails.

WAS WATERLOO CAUSED BY A FURSUIT MALFUNCTION?

Among the mind-melting new theories emerging from this discovery, one of the most insane is that Napoleon’s defeat at the Battle of Waterloo may have been due to a catastrophic fursuit-related accident.

A historical painting of the Battle of Waterloo with an added humorous element of Napoleon tripping over his animatronic fox tail

"New evidence suggests that Napoleon entered the battlefield wearing a custom-built, fox-themed armor set complete with an animatronic tail," said Dr. Jean-Claude Leclerc, whose entire career has now been rewritten by these findings. "Eyewitness accounts say he was 'acting strangely' before the battle—now we know it was because his tail mechanism got stuck in 'excited wag mode,' causing him to trip over repeatedly."

Historical records also indicate that during his exile on Elba, Napoleon ordered the construction of a massive fursuit workshop, where he spent his days designing the "ultimate fursuit" that he planned to unveil upon his return to France. Sadly, the world was not ready for his vision.

THE LOUVRE TO DISPLAY NAPOLEON'S SECRET FURSUIT?

In the wake of this history-destroying revelation, French officials are scrambling to respond. There are already rumors that the Louvre is considering replacing the Mona Lisa with a 12-foot-tall oil painting of Napoleon in full fursuit. Meanwhile, an emergency session of the French Parliament is set to discuss whether Napoleon should now be officially recognized as France’s first "Furry Emperor."

A mock-up of the Louvre museum with a large painting of Napoleon in a fursuit replacing the Mona Lisa

The furry community has wasted no time in claiming Napoleon as their new icon. Social media is flooded with tributes, and a Napoleon Furry Convention has already been announced in Paris, featuring lectures such as "From Corsica to the Con-Floor: The Secret Furry Life of an Emperor."

HISTORY WILL NEVER BE THE SAME

As experts frantically rewrite textbooks, the question remains: what else has history hidden from us? If Napoleon was secretly a gay furry, what does that mean for other historical figures? Was Julius Caesar actually a lion fursona? Was George Washington a secret wolf boy? Was the entire Enlightenment just a massive roleplay forum?

One thing is certain: the past is no longer safe.

Vive l’Empereur. Vive la fourrure. And may RougePatte run free forever.

New Historical Evidence Suggests Genghis Khan Maintained a Vast Network of Husbands

Mongolia – A recent discovery by a team of historians and archaeologists has upended long-standing assumptions about Genghis Khan’s personal life, revealing evidence that the famed Mongol ruler may not have amassed a harem of wives, as traditionally believed, but rather a vast cohort of devoted husbands.

An artist's depiction of Genghis Khan surrounded by his devoted husbands, set against a backdrop of the Mongolian steppes

The findings, derived from newly translated historical texts and genetic research, suggest that Khan’s relationships were far more diverse than previously recorded, challenging the conventional narrative of the 13th-century conqueror’s lineage and legacy.

A Reinterpretation of the Historical Record

For centuries, Genghis Khan has been portrayed as a prolific patriarch, with studies suggesting that his direct lineage could account for as many as 16 million living descendants. However, scholars now believe that misinterpretations of historical records and linguistic errors may have distorted the true nature of his relationships.

“The term traditionally translated as ‘wives’ appears, in several instances, to refer instead to ‘beloved companions’—a phrase that, in the context of Mongol culture, may have included men,” explained Dr. Rupert Fangbottom, a historian at Oxford University. “This forces us to rethink the scope of his influence, both as a ruler and as a historical figure.”

New Artifacts and Writings Support the Theory

Among the key findings supporting this new interpretation are personal letters, poems, and official decrees that appear to reference male partners in affectionate and even romantic terms. One fragment of a letter recovered from a 13th-century Mongolian encampment reads:

"To my steadfast Tolui, whose valor in battle is only rivaled by the warmth of his embrace—may the winds carry us together, now and always."

Additionally, certain Mongolian legal codes under Genghis Khan’s rule included explicit protections for “chosen companions,” a term that researchers now believe may have referred to same-sex unions within the ruling elite.

A historical document showing Mongolian legal codes with references to 'chosen companions'

“These records suggest that Khan’s interpersonal relationships were not simply transactional alliances for political expansion, but rather deeply personal connections,” said Dr. Linda Grosvenor, a historian specializing in medieval Central Asian studies.

Implications for Khan’s Legacy

The revelation has sparked widespread debate in academic circles, particularly regarding the implications for Genghis Khan’s genetic legacy. Previous studies indicating his widespread paternity may need to be reevaluated in light of this new perspective.

“It’s possible that his dynasty was maintained not through biological lineage alone, but through a highly structured system of kinship and personal allegiance,” said Dr. Wei Zhang, a geneticist involved in the research. “His impact may have been as much about cultural integration as it was about direct descent.”

In Mongolia, reactions to the findings have been largely positive, with scholars and cultural historians embracing the opportunity to revisit and refine their understanding of the great leader. “Rather than diminishing his legacy, this adds a new layer of complexity to his story,” said Batu Erdene, a historian at the National University of Mongolia. “It suggests he was not only a master strategist on the battlefield but also in matters of personal and political relationships.”

A modern-day Mongolian scholar examining ancient texts with a magnifying glass

As further research continues, historians anticipate that this discovery could prompt a broader reassessment of medieval Mongolian society, its social structures, and the historical narratives that have long been accepted as fact.

One thing remains clear: Genghis Khan’s influence on history is far from fully understood, and his legacy—whether as a warrior, statesman, or leader of an intricate personal network—continues to shape historical discourse in unexpected ways.